The Difference Between Facebook’s Family and Google’s Family is Nuclear

As much as I don’t like to use Facebook, I think their services are starting to beat out Google’s counterparts. But I’m not so sure it’s due to the underlying social layer as much as it is the visual continuity between their different services.
If you take a look at how Google has integrated its services (especially through acquisitions), they never seem to fully assimilate into the fundamental social-based Google design that is Gmail. Each service remains like a step child—a part of the family by definition, but easily told apart from the biological kids. Comparing “like” services between Facebook and Google, you can see it for yourself:












The services in order are:
- Dashboard (Facebook Live Feed vs. iGoogle)
- Profile (Facebook Profile vs. Google Profile)
- Messages (Facebook Messages vs. Gmail)
- Blog (Facebook Notes vs. Blogger)
- Photos (Facebook Photos vs. Picasa Web Albums)
- Video (Facebook Videos vs. Youtube)
I used to think it was just a simple toolbar that Google could implement across the top of all their sites to unify them. But I realize now that it’s much more than that. When you go to access any of the Facebook services, you always go to facebook.com and then navigate your way to the desired service. Whereas when you go to access one of the Google services, you generally type in the URL to access said service. So I believe the disconnect not only lies within the unified visual aspect, but the unified domain as well.
Google has too wide a range of separate established products that trying to unify them is implausible. Even Google’s CEO, Eric Schmidt seems to realizes this and has gone as far as to leak that Google’s social project is a “component” rather than another “service” that can connect their expanding plethora of services together. The main issue here is that there are already a number of services already live and kicking which accomplish the same thing (i.e. Facebook Connect, Twitter OAuth). Unless Google has bigger plans with their implementation of such a service, I don’t see how it can compete with the existing competition.
At this point, it’s too late in the game for Google to establish a social layer that can compete with Facebook. But what they can (and seemingly are) doing is creating a centralized hub for your digital life. If you go to edit your Google Profile “About” page you may notice under the “Links” section that Google has been quietly aggregating your social accounts across the web. For example, this is what mine looks like:

By doing this, Google is effectively creating an internet-wide network that supersedes the existing defined social networks. Google’s focus has extended far beyond it’s own family of applications and services. But to compete with Facebook’s tight knit nuclear family Google needs to not concentrate on a social service, but instead focus on the core product that has gotten them to where they are, search.
Facebook Photos Going Hi-Res So You Won’t Have To Squint To Relive Your Memories

In addition to the boost in maximum photo size, Facebook is also making some UI changes. The site is going to start rolling out a new light box-based photo viewer that lets you view photos without jumping between pages.
Facebook is stepping up their services.
Conan Takes Your Questions - Episode 2!
Facebook’s Annual Data Center Bill Now $50M

Data Center Knowledge reports that Facebook is now spending $50 million a year to lease data center space, compared to $20 million in May 2009. The leap in costs is not surprising given that the social networking site has grown from 200 million users worldwide in mid 2009 to 500 million now. […]
The Data Center Knowledge estimate doesn’t include the cost of server and storage hardware or electricity to power them. It’s thought that Facebook is running at least 60,000 servers in its data centers.
Yeah. I don’t feel so bad for paying $20/month for (mt) Grid-Service.
Source: allfacebook.com
Source: iheartchaos.com
How to use Facebook Places for Your Business
Yes, once you claim your “Place” you can merge it with your “Business Page”. I’m looking forward to when all of these will be indexed by Google, and searchable through Maps.
Why [Jolie O'Dell] Isn't Using Facebook
the default settings for Places were a bit of a surprise. They seem like they’d work well for a “normal” user whose Facebook friends are the people he’d invite to a birthday dinner, people who might already know his address, his intimate friends and family. But for me, the “power user” who is more “friendly” and more public with a wider range of people, the default settings just weren’t practical.
While I’m not “power user” myself, I identify with this philosophy. I’m not planning to use Facebook Places (at least right now) for the same reason that I don’t use Facebook status updates. I’ll probably only use when Places when it allows you to post on Twitter and disable posting on Facebook itself.
Facebook just launched their Foursquare knock-off, so the first thing you should probably do is go to your privacy settings, click customize settings, and make sure that only your friends can see where you’re checked in, that you’re not included in the “people here now” lists, and that your friends can’t check you in to a place.
Important to keep in mind.
Source: guillee

